Everything Vyvata knows about this product — the score, the evidence, the FAQ, and where else to find shopper reviews. No hidden data. Every vendor is scored on the same published rubric — no brand can pay for placement. Read the rubric →
56/100
Standard
Six-dimension breakdown
Transparency
52
Why this scored 56/100
Nutrigenomic testing looking at gene variants purported to influence nutrient metabolism, macronutrient response, and dietary sensitivities. Analytical validity of the underlying genotyping is decent (CLIA-certified PCR is reliable for called variants), but the clinical-utility literature is weak — most single-SNP nutrigenomic claims have not survived independent replication, and consensus statements from academic nutrition societies caution against acting on this class of testing. Effect sizes for reported variants (FTO for weight response, TCF7L2 for carbohydrate handling) are small at the individual level. Actual serum-based nutrient testing (B12, ferritin, 25-OH-D, RBC magnesium) is far more actionable than genetic predictions. Processing lab not disclosed. Would need explicit disclosure that recommendations are hypothesis-generating, not clinical.
The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.
Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.
How to read the Evidence dimension
80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.
FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.
Customer reviews
Reviews on other platforms
The Vyvata score measures product integrity against a published rubric, not customer sentiment. Vyvata does not aggregate, republish, or license third-party reviews — the links below open search pages on their respective platforms.
Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.
VSF score
56 / 100
Tier
Standard
Category
Diagnostics testing
Subcategory
nutrient deficiency testing, genetic dna
Last scored
Third-party certifications
None on record at time of scoring
Vendor
hellohealth
Product type
Lab test
Tags
hellohealth, Shopify Collective
Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.
