Everything Vyvata knows about this product — the score, the evidence, the FAQ, and where else to find shopper reviews. No hidden data. Every vendor is scored on the same published rubric — no brand can pay for placement. Read the rubric →
56/100
Standard
Six-dimension breakdown
Evidence
13
Formulation
12
Manufacturing
10
Safety
10
Transparency
6
Sustainability
5
Why this scored 56/100
A turmeric supplement labelled 'Platinum' with 'various forms of turmeric.' Curcumin has a moderate evidence base for inflammatory conditions — osteoarthritis pain (multiple RCTs at 500-1500 mg standardised curcumin daily show effects comparable to NSAIDs in some studies), metabolic syndrome markers, and depression as an adjunct. The problem is bioavailability: raw curcumin absorption is famously poor, and only formulations with piperine (BCM-95), phytosomes (Meriva), micronization (Theracurmin), or nanoparticles produce plasma levels associated with clinical effect. The description mentions 'various forms' but does not surface which enhanced-absorption form (or piperine content, or standardisation percentage of curcuminoids) is used. That opacity caps the tier. Solid mid-Standard.
The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.
Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.
How to read the Evidence dimension
80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.
FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.
Customer reviews
Reviews on other platforms
The Vyvata score measures product integrity against a published rubric, not customer sentiment. Vyvata does not aggregate, republish, or license third-party reviews — the links below open search pages on their respective platforms.
Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.
VSF score
56 / 100
Tier
Standard
Category
Supplements
Subcategory
longevity cellular
Last scored
Third-party certifications
None on record at time of scoring
Vendor
Minimo Nutrition
Product type
Natural Extracts
Tags
Minimo Nutrition, Shopify Collective
Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.
