Everything Vyvata knows about this product — the score, the evidence, the FAQ, and where else to find shopper reviews. No hidden data. Every vendor is scored on the same published rubric — no brand can pay for placement. Read the rubric →
58/100
Standard
Six-dimension breakdown
Evidence
14
Formulation
12
Manufacturing
10
Safety
10
Transparency
7
Sustainability
5
Why this scored 58/100
Whole-food vitamin C sourced from organic acerola (Malpighia emarginata) and amla (Emblica officinalis) rather than synthetic ascorbic acid. The food-source thesis has some merit — acerola and amla naturally deliver bioflavonoids alongside ascorbic acid, and observational data on food-form vitamin C is generally favourable — but head-to-head bioavailability studies comparing food-form to synthetic ascorbic acid consistently show equivalent plasma levels at matched doses. The 4-dropperful (4 mL) serving is unusually large for a vitamin C product, and the description does not disclose milligrams of ascorbic acid per serving. Zero-Assumption Rule prevents crediting an undisclosed dose. Vitamin C's evidence base for collagen synthesis, iron absorption, and modest cold-duration reduction is real. The product is honest about being 'gentle liquid form'; it just doesn't publish enough to earn Verified.
The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.
Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.
How to read the Evidence dimension
80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.
FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.
Customer reviews
Reviews on other platforms
The Vyvata score measures product integrity against a published rubric, not customer sentiment. Vyvata does not aggregate, republish, or license third-party reviews — the links below open search pages on their respective platforms.
Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.
VSF score
58 / 100
Tier
Standard
Category
Supplements
Subcategory
vitamins micronutrients
Last scored
Third-party certifications
None on record at time of scoring
Vendor
veggimins.com
Tags
Shopify Collective, veggimins.com
Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.
