Organic Herbal Liquid Blood & Parasite Cleanse

Six-dimension breakdown

Why this scored 30/100

'Blood & Parasite Cleanse' is one of the most extreme autofail patterns in the supplement category. First, 'parasite cleanse' marketing to a general population is functionally unverified_disease_claim — parasitic infections (giardia, cryptosporidium, tapeworm, roundworm, etc.) are diagnosed by stool ova-and-parasites testing or blood serology and treated with specific antiparasitic drugs (metronidazole, albendazole, ivermectin, praziquantel) targeted to the confirmed organism. General-population 'parasite cleanses' targeted at 'toxins' and 'flare-ups' are not medically coherent. Second, 'blood cleanse' has no physiological correlate — the kidneys and liver continuously clear blood metabolites in every healthy person; there is nothing to 'cleanse.' Third, the marketing framing ('reclaim your vitality... eliminate harmful parasites... restore total body balance') is textbook cleanse-scare marketing that convinces healthy users they have a hidden problem needing an expensive product. Compound autofail on unverified_medical_claim + unverified_disease_claim. This is one of the strongest rejections possible.

Evidence & sources

The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.

Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.

How to read the Evidence dimension

• 80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
• 60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
• 40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
• 20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
• 0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.

FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.

Customer reviews

All the data we have on this product

Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.

VSF score

30 / 100

Tier

Rejected

Category

Supplements

Subcategory

gut digestive

Last scored

August 30, 2026

Third-party certifications

None on record at time of scoring

Vendor

VeggieVerve

Product type

Weight loss

Tags

Shopify Collective, VeggieVerve

Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.