Lifepak® Nano Anti-aging Multivitamin Supplements

Six-dimension breakdown

Why this scored 61/100

LifePak Nano is Nu Skin's premium variant of LifePak, adding a nano-emulsification claim for the fat-soluble carotenoid and CoQ10 components. The 'Nano' name refers to reduced particle size to increase bioavailability of lipophilic ingredients — a real pharmaceutical concept for fat-soluble nutrients (CoQ10 in particular has poor baseline bioavailability, and nano/micronized/solubilized forms do measurably increase serum uptake per Ubiquinol vs standard ubiquinone comparative work). Nu Skin has published some internal comparative bioavailability data for LifePak Nano vs standard LifePak, though independent replication is limited. Underlying formulation is the same tier as standard LifePak — solid comprehensive multi with meaningful EPA/DHA, adequate D3, competent B-complex, mixed carotenoids. Same Nu Skin-MLM context caveats apply. Same 'Anti-Aging' marketing overreach on the carotenoid biomarker. Standard tier for the same reasons as regular LifePak, with a small upside from genuinely-plausible bioavailability improvement on fat-soluble components and a small downside from thinner independent validation of the nano claim specifically.

Evidence & sources

The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.

Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.

How to read the Evidence dimension

• 80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
• 60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
• 40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
• 20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
• 0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.

FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.

Customer reviews

All the data we have on this product

Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.

VSF score

61 / 100

Tier

Standard

Category

Supplements

Subcategory

vitamins micronutrients

Last scored

August 29, 2026

Third-party certifications

None on record at time of scoring

Vendor

Leaders Beauty & Wellness

Tags

Leaders Beauty & Wellness, Shopify Collective

Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.