Optimum Nutrition
THE BIOHACKING STANDARD
Welcome to our store
Couldn't load pickup availability
Everything Vyvata knows about this product — the score, the evidence, the FAQ, and where else to find shopper reviews. No hidden data. Every vendor is scored on the same published rubric — no brand can pay for placement. Read the rubric →
Boric acid vaginal suppositories at 600mg are a legitimate second-line treatment for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (particularly non-albicans Candida species like C. glabrata and C. krusei that are often azole-resistant) and for recurrent bacterial vaginosis unresponsive to antibiotics. The clinical evidence base is real: CDC's Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines list intravaginal boric acid 600mg/day for 14 days as an alternative treatment for recurrent VVC, and multiple published trials support the protocol. However, this product cannot be evaluated as a Vyvata supplement listing because it falls significantly outside the biohacking/longevity/wellness scope Vyvata covers, has serious safety implications requiring physician oversight (oral ingestion of boric acid is toxic — reported LD50 in adults is roughly 5-20g; vaginal use is safe only when not confused with oral use; pregnancy is a contraindication; the branding suggests recreational/OTC use rather than medical treatment), and the branding style ("Her Fantasy Box Fresh & Clean") frames a medical antifungal treatment as a cosmetic "freshness" product — which is exactly the class of positioning the FDA has warned against for vaginal boric acid products, as it misrepresents medical treatment as hygiene/cosmetic use and can normalize regular use of a compound that should be limited to specific clinical scenarios under physician direction. Rejected: out_of_scope_for_biohacking combined with misleading positioning as a hygiene product rather than a medical antifungal.
The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.
Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.
FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.
The Vyvata score measures product integrity against a published rubric, not customer sentiment. Vyvata does not aggregate, republish, or license third-party reviews — the links below open search pages on their respective platforms.
Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.
Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.

Optimum Nutrition
Onnit
WOW MD LLC
Prevagen
Find Your Protocol
A few quick questions about your goals and current concerns. We'll build a tailored protocol — a Basics list of essentials plus a comprehensive Biohackers list — across all Vyvata categories.
No signup required · Your protocol is private to you