Everything Vyvata knows about this product — the score, the evidence, the FAQ, and where else to find shopper reviews. No hidden data. Every vendor is scored on the same published rubric — no brand can pay for placement. Read the rubric →
48/100
Rejected
Six-dimension breakdown
Evidence
45
Formulation
42
Manufacturing
50
Safety
48
Transparency
45
Sustainability
55
Why this scored 48/100
Shilajit gummies are a marketing format masquerading as a delivery format. Traditional shilajit dosing is 300-500mg/day of purified resin (Keller 2019 for CoQ10 augmentation; Pandit 2016 for testosterone at 250mg BID). A gummy typically holds 100-200mg of a mineral pitch resin, and the sugar/pectin/glycerin matrix required to make a gummy palatable dilutes the active resin substantially per serving. Additionally, shilajit's core safety concern is heavy-metal contamination (soil-derived lead, arsenic, mercury, cadmium bioaccumulate in the raw mineral pitch), and a gummy format makes per-batch heavy-metal COA disclosure even more important — this SKU does not publish one. Vivalo is a small brand with limited manufacturing transparency. Not autofailed (the category is legitimate) but sits below Standard due to underdose format and missing COA.
The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.
Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.
How to read the Evidence dimension
80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.
FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.
Customer reviews
Reviews on other platforms
The Vyvata score measures product integrity against a published rubric, not customer sentiment. Vyvata does not aggregate, republish, or license third-party reviews — the links below open search pages on their respective platforms.
Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.
VSF score
48 / 100
Tier
Rejected
Category
Supplements
Subcategory
mens health
Last scored
Third-party certifications
None on record at time of scoring
Vendor
Vivalo
Product type
4
Tags
Shopify Collective, Vivalo
Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.
