Everything Vyvata knows about this product — the score, the evidence, the FAQ, and where else to find shopper reviews. No hidden data. Every vendor is scored on the same published rubric — no brand can pay for placement. Read the rubric →
40/100
Rejected
Six-dimension breakdown
Evidence
35
Formulation
38
Manufacturing
45
Safety
60
Transparency
28
Sustainability
45
Why this scored 40/100
'Green Superfood Energy Complex' is sold under a generic product-descriptor title with no extractable brand identity, positioned as a greens-and-reds powder combining 'four synergistic complexes' from vegetables, fruits, roots, and herbs. Three structural failures push this into Rejected. (1) misleading_naming — no brand identity in the title means users cannot look up manufacturer, facility, or COA history. (2) Multi-complex proprietary-blend structure with no per-ingredient milligrams — 'greens complex,' 'reds complex,' etc. is a textbook opaque-label design that hides how much of each botanical is actually present. (3) 'Superfood' is a marketing term with no regulatory or scientific meaning in nutrition; and 'energy complex' framing implies stimulant-like effects that greens powders typically cannot deliver without added caffeine or B-vitamin megadoses. The category itself (greens powders) is under-evidenced — even the best-studied products (AG1, Green Vibrance) show only modest biomarker changes in industry-funded trials.
The Vyvata score's Evidence dimension measures the quality of published RCT support for a product's active ingredients at the label dose. Our source hierarchy: double-blind RCTs in MEDLINE-indexed journals > single-blind RCTs > open-label trials > observational studies > mechanism papers > N=1 case studies (anecdotes). Predatory journals and manufacturer-authored studies without independent replication are weighted down.
Product-specific evidence citations for this item are embedded in the analysis text on the "Analysis" tab. For the full framework and evidence hierarchy, see the methodology page.
How to read the Evidence dimension
80–100: Multiple double-blind RCTs in indexed journals directly testing this product OR the exact ingredients at the exact dose.
60–79: Single double-blind RCT + supporting ingredient literature at the studied dose.
40–59: Open-label trials + ingredient literature; no product-specific double-blind evidence.
20–39: Ingredient literature only; no product-specific trials or trials in predatory venues.
0–19: No credible evidence base or unverifiable claims.
FAQ data has not been generated for this product yet. See the site FAQ for general questions.
Customer reviews
Reviews on other platforms
The Vyvata score measures product integrity against a published rubric, not customer sentiment. Vyvata does not aggregate, republish, or license third-party reviews — the links below open search pages on their respective platforms.
Every VSF-related metafield surfaced verbatim. Nothing hidden. If you spot data that looks wrong, let us know.
VSF score
40 / 100
Tier
Rejected
Category
Supplements
Subcategory
energy metabolic
Last scored
Third-party certifications
None on record at time of scoring
Vendor
Protein Zone
Product type
Greens & Superfoods
Tags
Protein Zone, Shopify Collective
Every score is set from the published rubric, audit-logged, and rescored whenever new evidence emerges (published trials, updated labels, third-party testing releases). Every vendor is scored on the same criteria — no pay-to-play. See our editorial-independence disclosure for the full policy, including brands with an editorial relationship to this site.
